Which of the following would describe a characteristic of a formal judge in a debate?

A formal judge in a debate serves as an arbiter, which highlights their role in evaluating the arguments presented by the participants without taking a side. An arbiter possesses the authority to render decisions based on established rules and criteria, ensuring that the debate is conducted fairly. This characteristic is crucial for maintaining the integrity and structure of the debate, as the judge must remain impartial and focused on the performance of the debaters rather than contributing to the arguments themselves.

In contrast, a mediator typically helps facilitate discussions between parties to resolve conflicts rather than judging the merits of each side's arguments. A participant actively engages in the debate, presenting their case and arguing for their position, which is distinct from the judge's role. An advocate openly supports a specific argument or position, which again diverges from the impartiality required of a formal judge. Therefore, the role of an arbiter effectively encapsulates the responsibilities and characteristics of a formal judge in a debate.